Donald Trump and the elite quest for freedom

The tweet is unclear at best, worthy of question, certainly not of conclusion, but Aaron Blake thinks that Donald Trump might—only might—have been admitting to an attempt to fire Jeff Sessions and Robert Mueller. Blake does conclude that “[a]ll of this undoubtedly leaves a perception that Trump wants people to have — that Trump can and might fire both men — to send a message to Mueller and Sessions. Trump has made clear he views this as his presidential prerogative.”[1]

One of the things I have noticed over the decades is that it isn’t really money that makes the world go round, but rather power. Money is a means to an end. People will do what you want them to do for money, including protecting you, including freeing you to pursue your own interests.

I’m far from the only one to notice this. Critical theory is, at its core, about exposing power relationships.[2] Anarchism is about distinguishing between “legitimate” and “illegitimate” power relationships, and seeking to abolish the latter. Hannah Arendt noted that in Greek “democracy,” power was reserved for those who were “free” from the need to work or labor to support themselves.[3] In Federalist no. 10, James Madison argued that a republic would limit power to those who were most “free” to set aside their personal interests (we see how well that worked out).[4] We might note that in both the latter cases, the class considered “free” included many slaveholders: They were “free” by virtue of their enslaving others, suggesting—as Arendt did—that this sort of “freedom” comes at the expense of the less fortunate, indeed that freedom is, at least to some degree, a zero-sum game.[5] And George Lakoff picks up on this irony, that freedoms may require others to commit to protect or fulfill them.[6]

In the tweet that Blake highlights, Trump is, at the very least, asserting his power, his freedom. That he may so act to remove a check on his own freedom, his own power, is one reason for suspecting he has an authoritarian impulse. Again, this freedom, this power comes at a considerable cost to others.

I remember on the morning that Barack Obama was first inaugurated, in 2009, I was teaching public speaking. I had heard a conspiracy theory that Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, was plotting martial law in order to retain power. Commuting and preparing for that class, I hadn’t had a chance to confirm that Obama had, in fact, been inaugurated.

We need to remember here that Bush and his administration are guilty of numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity. His invasion of Iraq was not based on evidence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction[7] but rather on neoconservative ambition and a personal animus against Hussein. Power facilitated criminality of the worst sort, just as it does with the Roman Catholic hierarchy and their ongoing sexual abuse of children.

So when it was time for Bush to give up power, we were expecting a criminal of the worst order to relinquish the world’s most powerful means for being a criminal. I lacked confidence he would do so.

But, as my class assured me, Obama was indeed inaugurated. Though they were political opponents, Obama declined to prosecute Bush or his administration,[8] famously expressing his “belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards.”[9] His administration also declined to prosecute the criminals behind the financial crisis of 2007-2008.[10] It is difficult to avoid an impression that the powerful see other powerful more as comrades and allies[11] against nearly everyone else[12] than as rivals, at least outside the ever rightward-expanding Overton Window.

But this tension between rulers and ruled itself constrains freedom. Rulers long ago understood that it was easier to persuade people to comply than to force their compliance.[13] The need to produce propaganda, the need to avoid too blatantly (ever less so with Trump[14]) contradicting that propaganda, and the often violent competition between rulers over which of them will control what territories and the resources and people within those territories[15] (and the capitalist analog of business competition) are burdens as much as they are expressions of raw power.

Which is to say that this zero-sum notion of “freedom” is not in fact freedom. Albeit with a great deal more creature comfort, at best, it substitutes a new set of burdens for those of work and labor to support oneself.

And in Donald Trump’s case, he lashes out at Mueller and Sessions because despite his pretensions, he is afraid to fire them. Whether or not by design, they encumber him.

We should, of course, spare the powerful no tears of sympathy. The rest of us pay a far higher price for elite privilege. They pursue a delusion that too often injures us or even costs us our lives, whether through dangerous working conditions, dangerous products, the criminal injustice system, environmental calamity, or wars. But recognizing the delusion for what it is is a step toward unraveling it and the system that has been built around it.

  1. [1]Aaron Blake, “Did Trump just admit that he tried to fire Mueller and Sessions?” Washington Post, August 30, 2018,
  2. [2]Raymond A. Morrow with David D. Brown, Critical Theory and Methodology (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994); Theo van Leeuwen, Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University, 2008); Gilbert Weiss and Ruth Wodak, eds., Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003); Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed. (Los Angeles: Sage, 2009).
  3. [3]Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1998).
  4. [4]James Madison, “Federalist No. 10,” in The Federalist Papers, ed. Garry Wills (1982; repr., New York: Bantam, 2003), 50-58.
  5. [5]Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1998).
  6. [6]George Lakoff, Whose Freedom? The Battle Over America’s Most Important Idea (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006).
  7. [7]Mark Danner, The Secret Way to War: The Downing Street Memo and the Iraq War’s Buried History (New York: New York Review, 2006).
  8. [8]Elizabeth Holtzman, “Statutes of Limitations Are Expiring on Some Bush Crimes,” Nation, March 20, 2013,
  9. [9]David Johnston and Charlie Savage, “Obama signals his reluctance to investigate Bush programs,” New York Times, January 2, 2009,
  10. [10]Jason M. Breslow, “Were Bankers Jailed In Past Financial Crises?” Public Broadcasting System, January 22, 2013,; William D. Cohan, “How to Crash an Economy and Escape the Scene,” Bloomberg, October 22, 2012,; David Dayen, “Eric Holder’s Longtime Excuse for Not Prosecuting Banks Just Crashed and Burned,” Intercept, July 12, 2016,; Adam Liptak, “Stern Words for Wall Street’s Watchdogs, From a Judge,” New York Times, December 16, 2013,; Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story, “In Financial Crisis, No Prosecutions of Top Figures,” New York Times, April 14, 2011,; Office of the Inspector General Audit Division, “Audit of the Department of Justice’s Efforts to Address Mortgage Fraud,” U. S. Department of Justice, March 2014,; Public Broadcasting System, “Phil Angelides: Enforcement of Wall St. is ‘Woefully Broken’,” Frontline, January 22, 2013,; Public Broadcasting System, “Ted Kaufman: Wall Street Prosecutions Never Made a Priority,” Frontline, January 22, 2013,; Jed S. Rakoff, “The Financial Crisis: Why Have No High-Level Executives Been Prosecuted?” New York Review of Books, January 9, 2014,; Barry Ritholz, “Why Prosecutors Whiffed on Subprime Crime,” Bloomberg View, March 14, 2014,; David Sirota, “Are banks too big to jail?” Salon, January 23, 2013,; David Sirota, “Barack Obama, Wall Street co-conspirator,” Salon, January 29, 2013,
  11. [11]C. Wright Mills, “The Structure of Power in American Society,” in Great Divides: Readings in Social Inequality in the United States, ed. Thomas M. Shapiro, 3rd ed. (Boston: McGraw Hill, 2005).
  12. [12]Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln, and Linda Tuhiwai Smith, eds., Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008).
  13. [13]Gerhard Lenski, Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966).
  14. [14]Greg Sargent, “Trump’s rage-tweets about Google reveal a frightening truth about the midterms,” Washington Post, August 28, 2018,
  15. [15]David Benfell, “We ‘need to know how it works,'” March 15, 2012,; David Benfell, “‘We have found the enemy, and he is us’ — and our system of social organization,” March 6, 2013,

Author: benfell

David Benfell holds a Ph.D. in Human Science from Saybrook University. He earned a M.A. in Speech Communication from CSU East Bay in 2009 and has studied at California Institute of Integral Studies. He is an anarchist, a vegetarian ecofeminist, a naturist, and a Taoist.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.